Tag Archives: AORN

Infection Control, Perioperative Nursing, Perioperative Practice, Surgical Best Practice

🚫 Artificial Nails in the Operating Room: More Than a Policy—It’s a Patient Safety Imperative

Leave a comment

In perioperative environments, details matter—especially those that impact infection prevention and patient safety. While acrylic and artificial nails may be fashionable, in the sterile world of the OR and Sterile Processing Department (SPD), they pose a real risk.

🔬 Evidence of Patient Harm

Healthcare workers wearing long or artificial nails have been directly linked to serious infections and even fatalities in patients:

📍 NICU Outbreak (USA)

  • Pathogen: Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  • Impact: 46 infected infants; 16 deaths

  • Source: Nurses with long and artificial nails

  • Outcome: Outbreak ceased after nail-length restrictions were implemented

📍 Spinal Surgery Fungal Infections

  • Pathogen: Candida albicans

  • Impact: Multiple patients developed postoperative osteomyelitis

  • Source: OR technician with artificial nails

  • Outcome: No further cases after technician was removed

🔬 Lab-Based Evidence

Studies show that:

  • Up to 87% of healthcare workers with artificial nails harbored pathogenic organisms, even after scrubbing.

  • Natural nails showed significantly lower colonization rates.

💰 The Financial Toll

Preventable infections don’t just harm patients—they’re expensive:

  • Cost per hospital-acquired infection:
    AUD $18,000–$42,000+

  • 10-case outbreak could cost a hospital $400,000+, not including litigation or reputational damage.

  • Surgical site infections (SSIs) cost hospitals about $20,000 per patient

  • MRSA-related SSIs can exceed $60,000 per case, with longer hospital stays and higher risk of complications

  • Even just 5–10 avoidable cases linked to policy breaches (like wearing acrylic nails) could cost a hospital hundreds of thousands of dollars

  • Infections linked to lapses in infection control—like poor nail hygiene—carry a major financial burden:

  • Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) cost the U.S. healthcare system an estimated $28–45 billion annually 📉

📜 What the Guidelines Say

✅ AORN (USA)

“Artificial nails should not be worn by perioperative team members who have direct contact with patients.”

✅ ACORN (Australia)

“Staff in the perioperative environment must not wear artificial fingernails or nail enhancements.”

Both standards emphasize natural nails ≤ ¼ inch in length, free from polish chips or artificial coatings.

🔄 Best Practice for OR & SPD Teams

  • Keep nails natural, short, and clean

  • Avoid all artificial enhancements (acrylic, gel, overlays)

  • Practice strict hand hygiene and glove integrity checks

🧠 Bottom Line

Nail hygiene in the surgical space isn’t about appearance—it’s about protecting patients. Even one overlooked fingernail can change a life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

📚 References

  1. Moolenaar, R. L., et al. (2000). A prolonged outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neonatal intensive care unit: did staff fingernails play a role? Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 21(2), 80–85.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/501745

  2. Hedderwick, S. A., et al. (2000). Pathogenic organisms associated with artificial fingernails worn by healthcare workers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 21(8), 505–509.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/501795

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2002). Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 51(RR-16), 1–45.
    https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/

  4. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). (2023). Guideline for Hand Hygiene.
    https://www.aorn.org/guidelines

  5. Australian College of Perioperative Nurses (ACORN). (2023). Standards for Perioperative Nursing in Australia.
    https://www.acorn.org.au/standards

  6. Alberta Health Services. (2020). Artificial Nails and Nail Polish in Healthcare Settings – Fact Sheet.
    https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/hp/hh/if-hp-hh-artificial-nails-in-healthcare.pdf

  7. World Health Organization (WHO). (2009). WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care.
    https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241597906

  8. Scott, R. D. (2009). The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention. CDC.
    https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11550

  9. Kaye, K. S., et al. (2009). The Cost of Surgical Site Infections in the United States. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
    https://www.wired.com/2009/12/one-surgical-infection-with-mrsa-61000

  10. Magill, S. S., et al. (2014). Multistate Point-Prevalence Survey of Health Care–Associated Infections. New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 1198–1208.
    https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/portal/index.html

  11. Graves, N., Halton, K., & Lairson, D. R. (2007). The economics of infection control: Hospital-acquired infections and patient safety. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 20(4), 337–341.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e3282638e25

  12. Gillespie, B. M., et al. (2021). The Burden of Surgical Site Infections in Australia: A Cost of Illness Study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 91(3), 387–392.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16339

  13. Infection Control Today. (2001). Artificial Nails Undermine Infection Control.
    https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/artificial-nails-undermine-infection-control

  14. CIDRAP. (2023). Study: Healthcare-Linked Infections Cost US $10 Billion a Year.
    https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/clostridium-difficile/study-healthcare-linked-infections-cost-us-10-billion-year

 

 

 

 

 

Clinical Governance, Healthcare Technology, Perioperative Education, Professional Development, Surgical Best Practice

📚 Why Time and Education Matter in Instilling Best Practice

Leave a comment

Embedding best practices into clinical skills requires deliberate time investment, structured education, and ongoing reinforcement. Research indicates that:

  • 🔍 Deliberate practice over time improves clinical performance.
    Ericsson et al.’s seminal work on skill acquisition demonstrates that expert performance arises from structured, repetitive practice—not merely experience. In surgical settings, this entails building skills through repeated exposure to procedural norms, instrument setup, and workflow protocols.
    (Ericsson KA et al., 1993. Psychological Review)

  • 🕒 Operating rooms are complex environments with high cognitive demands.
    A prospective observational study by Göras et al. (2019) found that surgical teams performed an average of 64 tasks per hour, with nearly half involving communication. Multitasking accounted for 48.2% of the time, and interruptions occurred at a rate of 3.0 per hour, predominantly due to equipment issues. These findings highlight the necessity for structured education and time allocation to manage the complexities of the OR effectively.
    (Göras C et al., 2019. BMJ Open)

  • 🧠 Simulation and structured education improve retention of best practices.
    A study in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons found that OR team members who engaged in simulation-based education were more likely to adhere to best practice protocols, such as surgical safety checklists and aseptic setup techniques.
    (Barsuk JH et al., 2009. J Am Coll Surg)

  • 📈 Structured learning platforms help consolidate complex clinical knowledge.
    Digital tools that reinforce policy-based workflows (like ACORN, AORN, AFPP) assist learners in absorbing, applying, and reflecting on clinical procedures in real-time. Platforms like ScrubUp bridge the gap between formal education and day-to-day clinical needs.

Final Thought (Updated):

By investing time in education and reinforcing evidence-based standards, we don’t just teach a skill—we nurture clinical judgment, adaptability, and professionalism. Whether it’s the first surgical tray setup or a case pivot under pressure, clinicians trained with time and structure are best equipped to deliver safe, efficient care.

References:

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-40718-001

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31097486/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19667306/

Clinical Best Practices, Education, Education & Training, Infection Prevention, Operating Room, Operating Room Education, OR Nursing, Perioperative Education, Skin Antisepsis, Surgical Nursing

Reducing SSIs Through Best Practice Skin Preparation: What Every OR Nurse Should Know

Leave a comment

Best Practice for Surgical Skin Preparation: Reducing the Risk of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs)

Surgical skin preparation is one of the most critical steps in preventing Surgical Site Infections (SSIs)—a complication that not only affects patient recovery but places a significant financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide.

🦠 Why Surgical Site Infections Matter

SSIs are among the most common types of healthcare-associated infections and can occur in up to 5% of surgical procedures. Their consequences extend beyond the immediate surgical outcome:

  • In Australia, SSIs add an average $18,814 to the direct cost of treatment per patient.

  • In the United States, SSIs cost the healthcare system $3.3 to $10 billion annually.

  • A single infection following a hip or knee replacement can add $12,689 USD in direct costs.

  • SSIs significantly prolong hospital stays, often requiring readmission, further tests, and additional treatment.

Given the clinical and economic impact, preventing SSIs is not only a patient safety priority—it’s a healthcare imperative.

🧼 What Is Surgical Skin Preparation?

Surgical skin preparation involves cleansing the skin at and around the surgical site to reduce the microbial count to the lowest possible level. The goal is to create a sterile field that minimizes the risk of microbial contamination during the procedure.

Key Principles of Best Practice:

  • Clean to Dirty: Begin at the cleanest area—typically the planned incision site—and work outward in concentric circles or squares.

  • No Double Dipping: Use a fresh swab for each pass. Never return a used applicator to the antiseptic solution.

  • Wide Coverage: Prep a generous area to accommodate any extension of the surgical incision.

  • High-Risk Zones Prepped Last: Areas such as the groin, umbilicus, open wounds, stomas, orifices should be cleaned last and with separate sponges.

  • Reverse Technique for Contaminated Areas: For high-risk zones, start at the cleaner periphery and move inward to the more contaminated center.

The AORN (Association of periOperative Registered Nurses) recommends selecting an alcohol-based prepping agent based on the anatomical location and patient assessment. Alcohol-based preps should not be used near mucosa, eyes, or ears. Iodine-based alternatives are safer in such cases.

📊 Why It’s Done This Way – The Evidence Behind the Method

The technique of prepping from clean to dirty and using separate applicators for contaminated zones is designed to:

  • Prevent cross-contamination within the sterile field.

  • Maintain the lowest possible bacterial load at the incision site.

  • Ensure compliance with infection control standards such as those outlined by AORN, ACORN, and WHO guidelines.

👩‍⚕️ Educating the Next Generation of Perioperative Professionals

Understanding why and how we perform surgical skin preparation is critical for novice operating room staff. Proper technique supports not only patient safety, but also team trust, procedure efficiency, and hospital sustainability.

Visual guides help reinforce learning by showing the correct prepping zones and motion patterns for various surgical sites.

📷 

✅ Final Thoughts

Following best practice in surgical skin preparation isn’t just a procedural checklist item—it’s a frontline defense against infection. When done correctly, it protects patients, reduces complications, and ensures that the operating team upholds the highest standards of care.

Stay vigilant, prep with purpose, and lead with best practice.